Different "use cases" introduce different variables and unknowns. The presence or absence of variables and unknowns may dictated that one use may be prefereable to another. If these other radioisotopes can be used, why aren't they?
Do any of them produce results reliably consistent with a young Earth theory?
No time now, but here’s a link to the chart, just so you know where I got it.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/time/table_of_isotopes.htm
“why aren’t they?” You’re the one implying that they’re not. I don’t see anywhere where these other isotopes have been rejected for any reason, and since they all use the same assumptions of uniformity of decay rates, known starting quantities, assumption of no leaching, they should all yield pretty much the same results, but rarely do.