Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MrB
OK, They "can be" used. Are they, and if they aren't, why not?

Different "use cases" introduce different variables and unknowns. The presence or absence of variables and unknowns may dictated that one use may be prefereable to another. If these other radioisotopes can be used, why aren't they?

Do any of them produce results reliably consistent with a young Earth theory?

316 posted on 10/04/2011 2:30:05 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

No time now, but here’s a link to the chart, just so you know where I got it.

http://anthro.palomar.edu/time/table_of_isotopes.htm

“why aren’t they?” You’re the one implying that they’re not. I don’t see anywhere where these other isotopes have been rejected for any reason, and since they all use the same assumptions of uniformity of decay rates, known starting quantities, assumption of no leaching, they should all yield pretty much the same results, but rarely do.


317 posted on 10/04/2011 2:36:22 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson