Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Byzantine Basileus
I'm not talking about conversion attempts.

I'm talking about openly sexual behavior among themselves in the presence of heterosexuals.

DADT seemed to have adequately addressed this issue, yet for some reason it was unsatisfactory to homosexuals.

What do you suppose that reason was?

163 posted on 10/02/2011 8:31:46 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: Madame Dufarge

The studies I have provided links to indicate that allowing homosexuals in the military have not damaged unit cohesion or caused a decline in effectiveness.


164 posted on 10/02/2011 8:34:30 AM PDT by Byzantine Basileus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: Madame Dufarge
What do you suppose that reason was?

Even gays have defective "gaydar" and make mistakes upon occasion. Those mistakes were very devastating to the faggot. Now there will be no mistakes, takes the pressure off, the faggots can prance in the open now and smell each other's bung holes like dogs..

182 posted on 10/02/2011 8:53:36 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson