Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Watch out for this group they are probably funded by George Soros. I call it Soro's Election 2012 insurance policy. If they can manipulate the voting and get who they want on the ticket we are in big trouble.
1 posted on 10/01/2011 10:58:03 PM PDT by Watchdog85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Watchdog85

Here is some more info on Soro’s possible connection to this group.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2785812/posts


2 posted on 10/01/2011 10:59:59 PM PDT by Watchdog85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85

Nice try. The political equivalent of the XFL (remember them?).

Sure, ol’ Georgy can buy himself a political party, apparatus, candidates and all, but even he can’t buy voters.

Political parties have to build from the ground up.


3 posted on 10/01/2011 11:03:13 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; Watchdog85
Let me ask: Do you know ANYONE who fantasizes about a Chris Christie candidacy?
4 posted on 10/01/2011 11:06:18 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85

It’s obviously yet another Soros front. Made even more obvious by the fact that The Daily Beast is pimping it. TDB led the Soros counter-attack on Beck after his November, 2010 special on Soros.

The old man is like liquid evil, seeping through the cracks of everything, everywhere.


8 posted on 10/01/2011 11:28:14 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85

I don’t particularly like any of the candidates, but I would not characterize them as weak. It is a very strong field. Many differences, some excellent, some mediocre, a couple of progressive Republicans....


9 posted on 10/01/2011 11:32:09 PM PDT by runninglips (Republicans = 99 lb weaklings of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85

I don’t think this is Soros.

There was something almost identical like this going on in 2007-08, called Unity08. Sam Waterston was their celebrity spokesman, and they had almost the exact same plan - an online primary choosing either a bipartisan ticket or a ticket with an independent.

At the time, I believed it to be a vehicle for Bloomberg, and the group’s founders did in fact ultimately leave the group to start a Draft Bloomberg campaign.

Many of the same players are involved in Americans Elect, and evidently it shared a business address with Unity08 for a time - which itself shared an address with Draft Bloomberg ‘08.

I suspect this is Bloomberg’s toe in the water for 2012, just as Unity08 was in the last election. He wants to test the country’s appetite for a centrist third-party candidate and to explore the feasibility of getting his name on the ballot in all 50 states should he decide to run.


10 posted on 10/01/2011 11:39:51 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Laugh, and the world laughs with you. Weep, and the world laughs at you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85

The LSM manufactures bull turd polls and then cites them as news. I don’t believe the Tea Party is less popular than Bush 43 at his lowest point. Avlon is a notorious smear merchant.


12 posted on 10/01/2011 11:58:05 PM PDT by rfp1234 (Anybody but Baracchio in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85

Who the heck is Soro?


14 posted on 10/02/2011 5:14:54 AM PDT by Lucas McCain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85

Any other citizen would be allowed to petition to put their name forward, providing they could accumulate at least 100,000 on-line support clicks — including a minimum of 10,000 supporters from 10 states — to determine broad-based support.

To me, this sounds like a union bit all the way. They are very adept at these signature campaigns (like Wisconsin). They can hand-pick and push their (union) candidate without wasting resources on primaries and debates and such. It is an effort by a group that is used to “organizing”. That’s what I see here. I could be wrong but this was my first thought.


15 posted on 10/02/2011 5:45:42 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85

All the more reason why we really REALLY need Sarah Palin to jump in.

A quasi-conservative third party effort would slaughter our chances of getting that bum out of the White House. It would split the conservative vote in half (anybody remember Ross Perot?) and give Obummer a free ride. That must not happen.

Sarah Palin has the cachet and name-recognition to blow both major-party nominees (whomever they might be) out of the water once she enters the race.


16 posted on 10/02/2011 7:41:35 AM PDT by DNME (We need new Sons of Liberty and their knack for civil disobedience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Watchdog85

There’s no way Baraq can win a 2-way matchup.

One way or another they have to make it a 3-way race where Baraq’s 40% support can give him a Clintonian plurality win.


19 posted on 10/02/2011 9:48:37 AM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson