Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasFreeper2009
she would no longer be a “private citizen” subject to protection, but a public servant subject to any and all attacks.

Incorrect. The bar is much higher for public v private but it is still there.

If Crown published lies as fact knowing they had no basis then they are in big trouble. Public or Private that is not allowed.

18 posted on 09/26/2011 4:39:10 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Can we ask questions which God finds unanswerable? Easily. All nonsense questions are unanswerable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear

you may know more about this than me honestly, in the back of my mind I thought public figures (especially political ones) were nearly completely stripped of protection from defamation. But I could be wrong, and probably am since I know almost nothing about the law.

I am just trying to look for any little fact or tid bit that might indicate which decision Palin is likely to reach.


37 posted on 09/26/2011 4:47:06 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

The socialists think they can do whatever they want to the ones they hate in this country. They think they are above the law. It would be great if Palin would straighten them out on that misconception.


66 posted on 09/26/2011 5:33:59 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson