Her run in 2008 as the VP nominee should put her at the top or not-at-all for 2012. Currently, she is still choosing not-at-all.
Her VP-nominee status gives her an edge for 2012, but does her political experience make her a better candidate?
The GOP elites would certainly do everything in their power to defeat her. They would prefer the status quo over.
==
If the GOP does field a candidate who wins in 2012, that new president is going to inherit one hell of a mess that makes the mess Obama inherited look like a picnic.
The question we should be asking is this:
Again: SARAH!
BTW, the Netanyahu interview on MTP is Must See TV!!!
Talk about the ability to see clearly and explain with ease.
Discussing the two-state situation, Gregory asked a “question” by reading a long quote of Bill Clinton that was critical of Bibi, and he just responded: In the Camp David meeting in 2000 convened by Clinton, it was Arafat who walked away from the parameters set by Clinton.
None of them. Palin is not a candidate.
It is the professional politicians who created this mess. Looking to them to clean up the mess is the equivalent of putting drug addicts in charge of the pharmacy.
Question should be,
Who has the executive experience, plans, communication and leadership skills to clean up that mess?
The only one who has all that is Herman Cain.