[xzins]

I’ve got to thoroughly disagree with this articles headline. It should read: Mitt Romney in DEEP trouble.

Why?

Perry performed poorly, but ROMNEY is the one who performed very well. DESPITE that good performance, he not only didn’t improve, but he actually dropped compared to his national poll numbers.

Perry lost support. The based refused to give Romney the support he would otherwise have earned. In short, they must not like him. There’s no other way to interpret those results.

[manc]

this shows us why we should not let non republicans vote in our primaries . Letting those non republicans vote will go to Romney and that is where he counts on winning. Surely this is a big FU to Ricardo Perry and Romney and the pro homo , pro cross dressing freak liberal media. It shows race has nothing to do with the vote or how we think. It shows we are fed up of B/S from some who are very well polished. We want a guy or gal who knows what we want, and how to create jobs and has some balls who will not be too PC. It shows we want a proper full conservative not some wishy washy pretending conservative who is liberal on social issues and some what liberal on fiscal matters. There is not one thing I disagree with Cain unlike the others except Rick S and MB though I do think Newt can easily beat zero in a debate and knowledge or how the country is supposed to work and the history of us

[M. Thatcher]

I’ve got to thoroughly disagree with this articles headline. It should read: Mitt Romney in DEEP trouble. Why? Perry performed poorly, but ROMNEY is the one who performed very well. DESPITE that good performance, he not only didn’t improve, but he actually dropped compared to his national poll numbers. Perry lost support. The based refused to give Romney the support he would otherwise have earned. In short, they must not like him. There’s no other way to interpret those results.

Totally agree. The geniuses on our side all declared Romney the big winner of the debate during Perry's self-immolation. Well, wrongo.