Warning: Herman Cain Needs To Answer His 2004 Support Of ZOT!

[Freeonparade]

When Herman Cain ran for Senate in 2004, he supported zotting trolls - he needs to be called on this

We can't risk another Mikey S.

[mnehring]

Herman Cain on the Issues- About as Right as you can get.
http://www.ontheissues.org/herman_cain.htm

[org.whodat]

Bet he has a broom in his closet.

[Salamander]

Oh, thank God.

I didn’t know who Mikey S was, either.

[that cereal ad kid who hates *everything*?]

[McGruff]

[muawiyah]

These guys gave up Mike Steele to bring in another Republican Establishment approved RNC Chairman.

That's a problem yet to be faced but we have a crowd at the top of the formal party structure who cannot be trusted to think Republican or Conservative.

Too much Old Kenosha Money in there even if Romney isn't the candidate.

[Jonty30]

Partly my fault for not using a smiley. :)

[trisham]

:)

[jazusamo]

Wow! That was a quick ZOT! LOL!

[ARepublicanForAllReasons]

He did not support AA

Thanks for the link to Cain's article. It definitively puts the lie to the noob's bald assertion that Cain supports AA.

The noob, 'Freeonparade', is a hit-and-run poster, possibly a DU plant. In any case, his remarks carry zero credibility with me.

[muawiyah]

Until proved differently I will assume the biggest flack on Caine is going to be coming from Preibus hissef’.

[trisham]

He didn’t even try. Two posts, and he’s out? They don’t make trolls like they used to.

[RedMDer]

Outstanding!

[Cicero]

Oh. Affirmative action. I thought he was talking about Alcoholics Anonymous.

[justsaynomore]

LOL! Sorry :-)

[cripplecreek]

Well as long as we're just making crap up....



Lemme tell ya about my 666 plan...

[Jonty30]

I don’t think it’s cowardice at all. It’s using people.

Rinos run to the right to get the votes, but then run to the left to get the money.

[muawiyah]

Your post is worth REWRITING so we can instantly understand what you said.

Basically you are saying that someone (Mac Collins ~ no idea who he was) noted that a candidate used a current reference ("in today's world") which was not exclusive of the past (when "AA" existed) so that meant he, Caine, supported that practice.

That's rather unprincipled, but it also violates several well understood rules of logic as well as English grammatical rules.

If I were to say "there's no room in today's world for Socialist BS" that does not mean that in the past I supported Socialist BS. In fact, I might have been part of a people's patriotic militia laying about in ditches waiting for our Socialist overlords to come down the road to gather loot from our impoverished villages ~ and then we'd leap up and shoot them. I could still say "there's no room in today's world for Socialist BS".

Interesting that Cain pulled up his numbers by his own efforts ~ and being the smart guy that he is, he can do that over and over and over.

[old curmudgeon]

I am not sure I understand your point.

Could you please repeat slowly?

[tutstar]

you’re fast!

[little jeremiah]

If Cain supported Zotting, that’s another plus!