Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibertarianInExile
Paul didn’t “endorse McKinney in 2008.”

He sure did. He endorsed McKinney, Baldwin and Nader. All at once.
The surrender monkey wants anybody who he thinks will destroy our ability to defend ourselves.
100 posted on 09/25/2011 5:17:15 AM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: John D; LibertarianInExile; All

He also supported Alan Keyes... In 1988 is left the GOP to run for President. He also left the GOP cause of Reagan...


104 posted on 09/25/2011 6:18:01 AM PDT by KevinDavis (What has Ron Paul done in Congress??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: John D; rabscuttle385; Bokababe; traviskicks; dcwusmc

Your statement has all of the reason and logic of your typical leftist arguement...merely with a different label. It’s really amazing you don’t see it.


111 posted on 09/25/2011 7:10:27 AM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: John D; dcwusmc

“[Paul] endorsed McKinney, Baldwin and Nader. All at once.”

You aren’t being so sneaky about Paul “endorsing McKinney” now because you’re so clearly caught not telling the whole truth. Hastily reversing yourself, now you say Paul ‘endorsed’ all three at once, instead of your prior insinuation that he individually endorsed the nauseating McKinney. Paul was actally endorsing not the candidates, hence Barr’s antagonism, but a liberty agenda. That is somehow an endorsement of specific third party platforms? Not hardly. Again, you’re just smearing the man and got caught redhanded doing it, so you’re just trying to see what you can get to stick. Your post reeks of desperation.

Incidentally, speaking to those platforms, while I think Barr, Nader and certainly McKinney have repeatedly evidenced their disinterest in our current “national defense” structure, I must have missed how Chuck Baldwin was going to “destroy our ability to defend ourselves.” That’s a new criticism I hadn’t heard. Is Baldwin’s platform somehow indicative of “destroying our ability to defend ourselves,” and I missed it? It’s right here: http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php#Defense


123 posted on 09/25/2011 12:29:50 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile (Rick Perry sweep the polls? Naw, the illegals he's coddled in Texas do all his sweeping.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson