“[Paul] endorsed McKinney, Baldwin and Nader. All at once.”
You aren’t being so sneaky about Paul “endorsing McKinney” now because you’re so clearly caught not telling the whole truth. Hastily reversing yourself, now you say Paul ‘endorsed’ all three at once, instead of your prior insinuation that he individually endorsed the nauseating McKinney. Paul was actally endorsing not the candidates, hence Barr’s antagonism, but a liberty agenda. That is somehow an endorsement of specific third party platforms? Not hardly. Again, you’re just smearing the man and got caught redhanded doing it, so you’re just trying to see what you can get to stick. Your post reeks of desperation.
Incidentally, speaking to those platforms, while I think Barr, Nader and certainly McKinney have repeatedly evidenced their disinterest in our current “national defense” structure, I must have missed how Chuck Baldwin was going to “destroy our ability to defend ourselves.” That’s a new criticism I hadn’t heard. Is Baldwin’s platform somehow indicative of “destroying our ability to defend ourselves,” and I missed it? It’s right here: http://www.constitutionparty.com/party_platform.php#Defense