The term I used is roughly synonymous with "flashing": which is an accurate if picturesque description of what you Perrywinkles infest this site with on a daily basis.
You know, in case it hadn't crossed your mind yet.
Or you think lurkers and others haven't noticed.
Here's another thought.
Just maybe the Admins are more lenient towards people flaming known trolls.
And a third point.
Just once, try addressing the *substance* of a candidate's positions, whether found in debates, or on candidate fan forums, or newspaper editorials, or the like.
Rather than running around saying "Perry's winning, Perry's going to win, Perry is amazing all comers, Palin will support Perry, Palin can't get in, Palin won't run" like a content-free (and substantiation-free) broken record.
Oh, and if you want "dumpster talk" read up on the Bristol Palin threads from today, or any of the Palin threads to see how liberals talk about Palin as a matter of course.
You know, like a convicted rapist talking about how he gets sexually aroused at the thought of Palin being subjected to intercourse so forceful by a particular NBA star that it distends and damages her digestive tract in addition to her genitalia.
But I didn't notice any outrage on your part about that...
Nice try on the faux outrage towards me, though.
Cheers!
So you are taking the same vile and foul language that liberals use against Palin but using it against another poster on this forum who said nothing foul about Palin.
Oh, please. I know all about you and all about the mods. Half of them are posters for Palin. As for you. Get lost. You can’t debate and you can’t dance, and we’ve all been exposed to what you dream about. Just take it somewhere else. Get lost.
Yuck, GW! Did you hafta post that?????