You started off by telling me not to treat Reagan like a god and then come back at me saying that Palin is the only one that anyone likes, that she’s Reagan incarnate and she’s desitined to capture the presidency and I’ll find out for myself.
How am I supposed to take the conversation seriously from that point on?
My intention was to say (and I did) that she is great, she has great qualities but despite her rhetoric she’s not close to Reagan. Her accomplishments are small and her executive record is light.
I’ll stand by that.
That said, if she gets the nomination I will vote for her.
If you're going to exaggerate the things I say, we're never going to have a reasoned discussion. It's also insulting to be mis-quoted, as you're doing.
For the record, you are treating Reagan like a god, or some kind of holy saint. No comparisons of Palin to him are allowed, whether the similarities exist or not.
Notice I said similarities, your grace. Maybe I should leave an offering in the plate?