[rcrngroup]

"This is an historic day for the Pentagon and for the nation," he said. "We have a zero tolerance with regards to harassment," Panetta told a Pentagon briefing.

And what about zero tolerance for gay officers & gay enlisted men/womaen hitting on non-gays, or threatening their careers unless they "submit" to sexual coercion or blackmail? Huh? Looks like the deck is stacked in favor of gays being able to harass & intimidate & coerce non-gays with complete abandon. May they all go straight to everlasting hell -- RAT bastard demoRATs / Rinos / 0dumb0 / Sec Gates & all the other bastards who are destroying our military & subjecting our overwhelming NON-gay men & women to harassment & abuse.

[Theodore R.]

No, the American people believe in “fairness” at all costs.

[USAF80]

I’ll post some of the finding from the DOD reports. This is what happens when you bunk with a homo.

277
Forcible
Sodomy
(Article 125,
UCMJ)
CONUS E2 M E1 Male Q3 Forcible Sodomy (Article 125,
UCMJ)
Court-Martial Charges Preferred On-post incident. Victim alleged that subject anally
sodomized him while he was intoxicated. Subject
convicted at GCM and sentenced to five years
confinement, DD, E-1 and total forfeitures.

268
Forcible
Sodomy
(Article 125,
UCMJ)
CONUS E5 M E4 Male Q2 Forcible Sodomy (Article 125,
UCMJ)
Court-Martial Charges Preferred On-post incident. Victim alleged that subject sodomized
him while victim was intoxicated. Subject convicted at
GCM and sentenced to 4 years confinement, DD,
reduction to E-1 and total forfeitures.

430
Forcible
Sodomy
(Article 125,
UCMJ)
CONUS UNK U E3 Male Q3 Not Applicable (N/A) Subject unknown On-post incident. Male victim alleged Forcible Sodomy
(Article 125, UCMJ) by unknown male.

[traditional1]

There will be plenty of busted noses and "GI Showers" from the hard-core REAL men of the military, who have NO USE for faggots hanging around. Unfortunately, we will now see that if you don't "diversify" and attend the soon-to-be-prolific "sensitivity training", you will be singled out and disciplined. Overt advances by the faggots and dykes will be tolerated, as we can't "offend" them in the "politically correct" NEW military.

The push for sissyfying the military comes from non-military politicains, pandering for votes, and/or, sex deviates themselves.

NO real military-experienced veteran has any tolerance for sex deviates, and the introduction of women into the military overall, was the first mistake, and the start of the slippery slope.