[ctdonath2]

Oh, don’t get me wrong - I agree. I’ve been arguing the “not yours to take” line elsewhere. I just like to take the opposition’s premise and run it to its objective conclusion, in this case observing that for all the wealth “the rich” enjoy, there really isn’t that much income to tax after giving them a reason to defer all income outside basic cost-of-living.

[mewzilla]

Well, if progressives really wanted to soak the rich, they'd be all for taxing wealth. Maybe someday their supporters will acquire some sense and ask their pols why the pols won't vote to do that.

Note to the useful idiots: It's really not rocket science, you boneheads.