Well, at least you finally answered!
Now, why would the Founding Fathers specifically state that ONLY for the President (and VP, if I am not mistaken?), the person must be a natural born citizen as opposed to a citizen?
As one Justice of the Supreme pointed out during an oral argument, the Founding Fathers actually said the President had to be natural born AT THE TIME of the adoption of the Constitution.
This just goes to show that the wording of the Constitution didn’t always fit their idea. Commas do make a difference.
The Founding Fathers didn’t intend for the VP to actually become President. He was to only be acting President. In fact, the early drafts of the Constitution didn’t even provide for a VP.
Legal Scholars differ on the requirements of Natural Born Citizenship. There can be MORE THAN ONE DEFINITION. Is there? No one knows for sure. It hasn’t been decided.