How much is the Democratic Party paying you to come on here and insult people?
I was THE FIRST on this site to try to bring the truth to light about this issue as it pertained to British Citizenship and bigamy.
I look for the truth..not a flim flam.
Conservatives who try to flim flam and refuse to acknowledge all aspects of this do the Conservative movement no favors.
That doesn’t mean the Dems pay me. There are Conservatives that believe in the truth... no matter which way it falls.
And as it pertains to Natural Born Citizenship - IT IS NOT SETTLED LAW.
Btw, The Founding Fathers didn’t want the VP as President...but look what has happened. It is possible that they thought that someone who was not natural born could be VP because they would never be President just by virtue of the office of VP.
Do you know the history surrounding all of this. Of course you don’t. Everyone carries on about the Founding Fathers.
Do you know the role John Jay played in this??? What about the belief that the Convention was considering having a Monarch. YES, a King.
People on this site carry on and on about how the Founding Fathers didn’t want this or that and that is why they fought the revolution BUT THEY CONSIDERED HAVING A KING!
And just around this time John Jay wrote a letter.
Or what about the use of native-born versus natural born and how those words played out as it related to Senators and Representatives and the role Madison played in it?
People who have tried to realistically educate themselves on this subject differ as to what they believe on the definition of natural born...but anyone who refuses to acknowledges that a Chief Justice DECLINED to resolve the issue just has no credibility because they have not sufficiently educated themselves.
People here carry on and on and one and don’t know a damn thing about what really went down during the writing of the Constitution