Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Squeeky

They conveniently just gloss over very specific wording. How hard is it really to understand these two sentences:

“As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts. “


109 posted on 09/20/2011 6:07:23 AM PDT by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

It ISN’T very hard, and either a reasonably smart or reasonably honest person would simply ask themselves if “Gee, I wonder if another court later on WOULD find it necessary to solve any doubts???” Which would lead them to that Won Kim Ark thingy. But the Vattle Birthers DON’T, which is why I say they are either dishonest or really really dumb.


110 posted on 09/20/2011 11:02:24 AM PDT by Squeeky ("Truth is so rare that it is delightful to tell it. " Emily Dickinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson