IMO repeating an anecdotal account as fact is a sign of poor judgment, no matter how well-meaning the person who told her the story.
And if Michelle is lying, she's a real jerk.
I use to like Bachmann, but there is an impulsiveness and/or intensity about her that concerns me re: her judgment. There is something about her that reminds me of Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction (I think it's the eyes).
Yup, the old “I used to love Michele Bachmann” cliches until she made Rick Perry look like a litte girl. If he’s such a genuis, why didn’t he stand up to her and refute her accusations? Instead, he looked like the eternal deer in the headlights. For some of us on FR, that was a real turnoff.
Anecdotes are not science. She ought to have known better.
I use to like Bachmann, but there is an impulsiveness and/or intensity about her that concerns me re: her judgment. There is something about her that reminds me of Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction (I think it's the eyes).
You go over the line here into sexism. She is a beautiful woman. "Impulsiveness", "intensity"? Santorum has the same, yet you would nevey make such a silly comparision. C'mon.
She was an IRS “attack” lawyer, or so I’ve read. If so, destroying lives means nothing at all to her. Is this true that is what she was? Just wondering if I heard the truth.
Hmmm, your comments make me think of someone else.