I'm talking about the three groups attacking Perry. NOT the "three Freeper Groups attacking Perry". You will note that the first group attacking Perry that I listed were the liberals, that should have been your first clue that I wasn't talking about Free Republic. IF you had paid attention, you wouldn't have resorted to a childish insult.
As for your accusations against Palin supporters, you’d better back off.
I really am no good at paying attention to threats. And if you are trying to pretend that some Sarah Palin supporters are NOT working against Rick Perry, that would fly in the face of established fact, both here and elsewhere. Let's remind people of what I actually claimed, lest your threat's implication be misunderstood: Third are some of the Palin folks, who saw the easy entry into the contest by Sarah Palin blocked by Perry’s quick rise to the front of the pack. Romney was no obstacle for her, being well to her left, but Perry occupied her space and needed to be pushed aside.
Feel free to disagree, but I think it's clear that there are Palin folks, including some here at FR, who are working to push Perry out of the frontrunner status to help clear the path for Sarah Palin. Do you really think there are not? In fact, why do you call this an "accusation"? Do you think it would be WRONG for Palin supporters to be attacking Perry to bring him back down to earth?
I think not, according to your next statement: ALL candidates are vetted, and that process includes both positive and negative articles.
I also don't know where you got the idea I was opposed to negative articles. I am somewhat opposed to negative articles posted a dozen times, or negative articles accepted as fact when they are clear left-wing smears, but we deal with them by answering them.
My post was simply an observation in response to the comment I responded to, that there were three major groups going after Perry right now. I would presume that other candidate's supporters are also going after Perry, but they have so few supporters that it isn't really a factor.
And don't get me started about your red herring Free Republic isn't about to change to suit you nonsense. I'm not calling for a change, I'm pointing out an observation. I didn't say it should change, but I find it useful in evaluating people's opinions to understand reasons they might have for misinterpreting something like the letter in this article.
I guess I struck a nerve somehow, but you shouldn't think that anything I wrote was a call to get negative articles banned.
Keep spinning, Charles. Your own posts dispute this one.
FReepers are very smart. We do not need you to point out “inuendo, mistruths or disputed facts” in posted articles, or to accuse Palin supporters of anything that may cause fear or worry for you.
I think you are a pot stirrer and I stand by that.
A helpful dose of MYOB and stick to the topic might be order for you. For examples, support your candidate and try to learn about the others without getting into accusations about supporters of others.