Posted on 09/16/2011 9:35:27 AM PDT by onyx
They kicked her around, victimized her, tried to destroy her. But all of a sudden, the lamestream media is coming to Sarah Palin’s defense.
Faced with a barrage of negative portrayals — a much-hyped investigative book, a Levi Johnston memoir and a new movie — Palin is finding support in the unlikeliest of places.
Film reviewers have slammed the British documentary “Sarah Palin: You Betcha!” Newspapers have refused to run comic-strip excerpts of Joe McGinniss’s rumor-mongering tome “The Rogue.” Johnston’s accusations have been consigned to the gossip pages. And none other than The New York Times has angrily taken Palin’s side in a brutal takedown of the McGinniss book.
Reviewer Janet Maslin called “The Rogue” a work of “caustic, unsubstantiated gossip,” accusing its author, who rented a house next door to the Palins for a time, of sloppiness, attention seeking and a lack of neighborliness.
“‘The Rogue’ is too busy being nasty to be lucid,” Maslin concludes, describing its many accusations as “indefensibly reckless.”
In a statement issued through a PR representative, Todd Palin trumpeted the Times review, pointing to it as proof that the book was so reprehensible that “even The New York Times” disdained it.
But it wasn’t the first time in recent weeks the Palins have found the Times — the print voice of East Coast intellectualism — in their corner. The Gray Lady also recently published an op-ed praising Palin as a person of ideas and calling for her to be taken seriously.
The column by Anand Giridharadas — impeccably credentialed as an Aspen Institute fellow and Cambridge, Mass., resident — accused the media of “ignoring the ideas [Palin] unfurled” in her recent speech at an Iowa tea party rally. “Ms. Palin may be hinting at a new political alignment that would pit a vigorous localism against a kind of national-global institutionalism,” he wrote.
It’s a lot of love for Palin from the news outlet she decried back in March in a Facebook post titled “NYT, There You Go Again,” wherein she speculated that the paper’s “false reporting” was the source of its “economic and reputation woes.”
And it’s not the sort of treatment Palin generally perceives from what she loves to call the “lamestream media” — because, as she explained in another Facebook post, “The ‘mainstream’ media isn’t mainstream anymore. That’s why I call it ‘lamestream,’ and the LSM is becoming quite irrelevant, as it is no longer the sole gatekeeper of information.”
“The Rogue” hasn’t yet been widely reviewed — the Times defied the publisher’s embargo to publish its take, and the Los Angeles Times followed suit with a less acerbic take that nonetheless called the book “tame” and said it lacked credibility. But many of its accusations have been aired over the past several days in “Doonesbury,” which received McGinniss’s permission to weave excerpts from the text into the strip’s narrative.
Once again, though, media outlets haven’t played along with the anti-Palin gambit. The Chicago Tribune and other newspapers have declined to publish the “Doonesbury” strips, with the Trib explaining, “The subject matter does not meet our standards of fairness.”
And then there’s “You Betcha!” a cheerfully ruthless documentary about Palin from Nick Broomfield, whose past subjects have included Kurt Cobain, Margaret Thatcher, Heidi Fleiss and Tupac Shakur.
The film premiered last week at the Toronto International Film Festival, and it wasn’t exactly a critical darling.
Variety called it “a sarcastically toned, strategically timed character assassination” that “lacks sufficient humor and insight to make it a must-see for anyone outside the Brit muckraker’s fan base.” Other critics called it “obnoxious” and “unnecessary.”
When reviewers turned their noses up at “The Undefeated,” the pro-Palin film that came out in July, Palin’s fans cried foul and blamed critics’ presumed liberal tendencies. But the critics faulted the anti-Palin movie for the same flaw they noted in “The Undefeated” – clumsy one-sidedness.
Now that the enemy has crossed to their side, Palin’s fans don’t quite seem to know what to do.
 |
Personally I think its a trick don’t fall for it Palin
Hardly. We know exactly what to do. Point out to anyone trying to give credence to McGinnni's book that it is such a stinker that even the NY Times panned it.
politico Book club (survey at the link)
Will you read “The Rogue,” Joe McGinniss’s book on Sarah Palin?
8% Yup - Can’t wait.
8% Maybe - But I won’t buy it.
35% Nah - Not interested.
46% Not if it were the last book on Earth.
0% I’m not sure.
I smell a bunch of rats here......Sarah better watch out.
Prescisely. Even their own survey reflects our views.
Rat trap.
Too bad the NYT can't be taken seriously.
Born February 11, 1964 in Sandpoint, ID (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)
Parents were
Charles R Heath, born in ID
Sarah Sheeran, born in WI
Both parents were US Citizens at the time of her birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)
Sarah Palin is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama ISN'T!
Hm....not trusting them “defending” Sarah! LOL!
That's got to be one vile book...
Not sure why the LSM is defending Sarah Palin now. I’d like to think that her comments shaming the media for not reporting the who, what, when, where and why are having a positive effect. Who knows?
i think its the fact they realize the attacks will be coming from all angles against obozo over the next year- and while they may try and cry racism they understand people realize what a joke he is...so to set up their defense of obozo they are now defending Pailin so as to say, “well heck- we defended Palin against attacks”...
Doonesbury's a hater cartoon... sad - it once was better than this kind of crap...
I have noticed the story has died a sudden death.
Something sneaky is going on.
“Rat trap.”
Most definitely IMO.
Doonesbury's a hater cartoon... sad - it was better once... above this kind of crap...
Occam’s Razor: the simplest answer is most likely the correct one.
The simplest answer in this case is that the left-wing media is annoyed by the amateurishness of the recent attacks, and their too-early timing. They have to condemn them to protect their own reputations.
bump.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.