btw...I don't care who she screwed or what drugs she may or may not have taken....all my objections to your idol are strictly about her performance as an elected official and her hokey-pokey dance of self enrichment while stringing a bunch of chumps along since quitting her las position.
So in your opinion, pointing out that a given attack is from a liberal hell-bent on destroying Palin and is a highly questionable construct is an act of ignoring cracks in the halo.
And then you wonder why you get flamed. The NY Times article I linked to above says McGinnis undoes any legit points he might have to make about Palin by mixing in so much garbage that the reader cannot tell what is trash and what is real.
And your approach does the exact same thing. As I noted above in a different posts, conservatives can disagree about Palin's history. But your approach throws liberal mud into the discussion. So spare me your hysterics. If you want Palin supporters to act in a more civil manner, try improving your own approach as well. You don't put out a fire with gasoline, and liberal gasoline is exactly what many of your posts add to the debate.