I see, so we are supposed to just blow off all attacks on the character of public figures.
And since when is the character and reputation of a politician a popularity contest?
The fact is, McGiness’ allegations have been around for quite some time. Nothing new about them. They were hinted at at least 2 years ago.
A 23 year old chick snorting blow in 1987? Or sleeping around? What a SHOCK!
It just builds and builds about her.
And “fear” has nothing to do with it. Revulsion is more likely.
And, to reiterate something I said before, why do the salacious attacks just come after CERTAIN GOP women, namely Haley and Palin? Why not Bachmann or Blackburn or the new congresswoman from Dakota?
Just that fact alone makes me wonder.
We can do much, much better than electing tainted candidates.
Because you WANT to go there. Basically you are rewarding the MSM attack approach by the reaction to their level of vitriol in your own mind, and quite frankly that is pathetic.
We can do much, much better than electing tainted candidates.
We can do a lot better on FR than trolls who lap up MSM attacks.
Well, I would expect folks who have been on FR for some time to have acquired enough history and discretion to examine the source and that source's motives in assessing the proper veracity to the allegations, or lack thereof. Apparently your PDS has hindered that ability (but that seems to be a common symptom of PDS).