[Sudetenland]

So, you think that ten year old children should have a say in what their parents decide about them? I wasn't aware that 10 year olds had the maturity and knowledge about the world necessary to make such decisions . . . that's what parents are for.

Maybe we should as k children if they should have to go to school too. /rolleyes

These arguments are getting more and more pathetic and irrational as this campaign proceeds.

[DoughtyOne]

In response to your comments, I’m going to have to go with addressing the decision making abilities of any adult who would force this vaccine on a ten year old child.

This is not a highly communicable disease, and it should never have been forced on ten year olds. As a young woman matures, she can make her own decision regarding this vaccine.

As long as the kid is not sexually active, there’s no reason to force this on them. When a child is old enough, and there is access for them to have sexual activity, then I do think it’s best they be presented with the options and make their own choice concerning this vaccine.

Whether that’s at 14 or 17, I still think it’s the kids body that is being exposed to the vaccine or the cancer producing malady. They should make they choice whether they’ll chance dying now or at 45 to 50, if even then.