Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marlowe; editor-surveyor; CharlesWayneCT; xzins; wmfights

“There isn’t a cancer that can’t be cured by the right diet, as long as no pharma poisons, radiation, or surgery have spoiled the chances.”

I employ diet as part of my anti-cancer regimen and I think it’s important, but that statement’s over the top. There are people who have tried diet and alternative medicine before trying allopathic treatments and it didn’t cure their cancer (some, yes - but by no means all). Not to mention that there are strongly conflicting opinions on what the best dietary approach is...total vegans, Paleo-diet advocates (a la Weston Price Foundation), raw foods only, Gerson therapy, etc., etc., etc.


1,991 posted on 09/12/2011 9:33:13 PM PDT by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1951 | View Replies ]


To: Magic Fingers

No, its not over the top, it is completely accurate.

The time, and specific diet vary depending on the type of cancer, and the level of progression.

Webster Kehr’s site has the necessary information for all types. There is such a thing as “too late” though. That isn’t the fault of the treatment.

With the AMA method, the patient never gets the chance to die of cancer; the therapy kills them first.


2,058 posted on 09/12/2011 11:03:10 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Sarah Palin - 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1991 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson