Posted on 09/09/2011 9:06:56 PM PDT by ConservativeMind
The way some people talk, you'd think that a flat tax system -- in which everyone pays at the same rate regardless of income -- would make citizens feel better than more progressive taxation, where wealthier people are taxed at higher rates. Indeed, the U.S. has been diminishing progressivity of its tax structure for decades.
But a new study comparing 54 nations found that flattening the tax risks flattening social wellbeing as well. "The more progressive the tax policy is, the happier the citizens are," says University of Virginia psychologist Shigehiro Oishi, summarizing the findings, which will be published in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science. Oishi conducted the study with Ulrich Schimmack of the University of Toronto at Mississauga and Ed Diener, also at University of Illinois and the Gallup Organization.
The researchers analyzed the relationship between tax progressivity and personal well-being in 54 nations surveyed by the Gallup Organization in 2007—a total of 59,634 respondents. Well-being was expressed in people's assessments of their overall life quality, from "worst" to "best possible life," on a scale of 1 to 10; and in whether they enjoyed positive daily experiences (such as smiling, being treated with respect, and eating good food) or suffered negative ones, including sadness, worry, and shame. Finally, the analysis looked at the participants' satisfaction with their nation's public goods, from schools to clean air.
The degree of progressivity was measured by the difference between the highest and lowest tax rates, corrected for such confounding factors as family size, social security taxes paid, and tax benefits received by individuals.
The results: On average, residents of the nations with the most progressive taxation evaluated their own lives as closer to "the best possible." They also reported having more satisfying experiences and fewer discomfiting ones than respondents living in nations with less progressive taxes. That happiness, Oishi says, was "explained by a greater degree of satisfaction with the public goods, such as housing, education, and public transportation."
Higher government spending per se did not yield greater happiness, in spite of the well-being that was associated with satisfaction with state-funded services. In fact, there was a slight negative correlation between government spending and average happiness.
"That data is kind of weird," Oishi says. He guesses that the misalignment might indicate national differences in the efficiency with which those services are delivered or in people's relative ability to access them. For example, the U.S. spends more on education and health care than other developed countries, "but its international standing in those areas is not so great." Such puzzling findings may be illuminated in further research.
The study, like others Oishi has done looking at connections between economics and personal life, has important social implications. "If the goal of societies is to make citizens happy, tax policy matters," he says. "Certain policies, like tax progressivity, seem to be more conducive to the happiness of the people."
Provided by Association for Psychological Science
The US ought to be one of happiest places, as roughly 50% of all households don't pay income tax, simply due to all the rest doing so on their behalf.
This is a senseless study, but it will be used by "progressives" to bolster their positions.
You forgot the barf alert.
The purpose of a university education is train the "prophets of socialism." -- From a book called "The History of Socialism" that I came a cross in a public library a half a lifetime ago. It was from the 50's or 60's, I'd guess, and it the bit I read detailed how socialism was to be propagated on a model lifted from the Church, with "prophets", "evangelists," and what have you.
Not if you had a conscience, you wouldn't. You'd be miserable.
We’d need warp speed to reach these people. They’re pretty far out there.
What a load. I wonder if they polled Russia, China, Cuba and North Korea. Let’s see what happens when we get to the maximum levels of government control.
It is not a senseless study, but a BS study.
I would think that a flat tax would make more people happy or even national sales tax rate. Either one would work better then the convoluted tax code we have to live by.
“If the goal of societies is to make citizens happy, tax policy matters,” he says. “Certain policies, like tax progressivity, seem to be more conducive to the happiness of the people.”
So folks are happier if they pay more taxes?
If it is true it is solely because they have convinced themselves that the government is the best way to provide for others what people ought to do either directly or through the Church. Outsourced charity is not genuine charity.
Of course they’re happy, they’ve learned to love Big Brother.
It’s true:
46 happy Pauls for every unhappy Peter.
Yes, Yes...
Envy and Jealousy are good for mental health. /s
A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Plank 2.
Chapter II. Proletarians and Communists
The Communist Manifesto
Are these that same people who tried to sell us “funemployed” last year?
It would be great if everybody in the U.S. were able to participate in supporting the country in which they live. That means that everyone, yes even the streetcorner people, pay some amount of tax; that would be good for their self-esteem and good for the country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.