It’s called subordinating your own views to the positions of the campaign, every bit as much as a lawyer tries to massage facts to fit his arguments. Should she have resigned from Juan’s campaign, just b/c some of his positions were goofy? Life isn’t perfect, but one can do much more good from the inside.
In Going Rogue, she frankly states that many of the things that the McCain “experts” wanted her to say, esp. in the debates, were “non-answers”. C’est la vie. I’m not going to hate her or disrespect her for it. Focus on what she says now, and what she DID as governor of Ak. when she acted *for herself*. Bob
Have fun with that. It’s not about Palin. It’s about YOU. You’ve been warned.
. There was no need to resign. If she disagreed with McCain on some issues then she should not have acted as a cheerleader for those positions. Once she was the nominee, she was free to say whatever the hell she wanted to say. McCain picked her to be the nominee. She therefore had an obligation to be herself.
I'm doing that with Perry. I like what I hear now.