Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: normy
She went on Univision to press this point of view. She claimed they were her own, not "we" or "this ticket"

I've seen the transcript from the Univision interview many times, and don't ever recall those words, or that implication coming from her lips.

I call bull.

84 posted on 09/09/2011 7:34:49 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier
But the questions were to her. McCain wasn't there. Maybe she hadn't formed a solid opinion yet but she is the one who called it inhumane. She didn't say "we think it's inhumane". They are her words and whether fair or not she will be forced to explain them and how far off they are from her words to O'Reilly.

If her explanation is "well Iwas touting the party line" she looks weak. She would have to say "I studied it further and decided X"

When you speak your own words, without qualifying it with "our team" or "this ticket" or even "Sen. McCain" then they should be taken as your words.

I don't really care she said them because it is a tricky subject but I point it out to show where her supposed purity is not really as pure as you might think and she will have to explain, if she decides to run.

For the record, I don't care if she does or doesn't, although I lean toward doesn't because I want the party to rally around Perry. But if she does, she can only lose ground. It's getting to the point she will appear to be parroting Perry.

85 posted on 09/09/2011 7:46:07 AM PDT by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson