Replies

RE :”You've spent your time on this thread trashing people drawing social security because you thought they were evil to take Social Security payments after paying in like you are, for 45 to 50 years.....
As long as the $50 to $100 bucks you pay in each payday is cut to zero, it's doesnn’t bother you that people who paid that same $50 to $100 bucks for 45 to 50 years, wind up with zero retirement dollars. That's infantile....School-ground, sixth-graders, kindergarteners, you're talking points express that level of logic. Grow up.”

You are using liberal arguments to defend a socialist system where the government plunders the politically weak (the young) to give to the politically (strong) the old. This is exactly what Marxist Jesse Jackson calls for every day: Democratic Marxism, for the Feds to take from others and give to those they think is deserving .

Calling me 'infantile,School-ground, sixth-graders, kindergarteners' and telling me to 'grow up' WON'T make you right anymore than when Chris Matthews does it to promote similar redistribution. I have been called worse,

RE :”You've spent your time on this thread trashing people drawing social security because you thought they were evil to take Social Security payments after paying in like you are, for 45 to 50 years.....

As long as the $50 to $100 bucks you pay in each payday is cut to zero, it's doesnn’t bother you that people who paid that same $50 to $100 bucks for 45 to 50 years, wind up with zero retirement dollars. That's infantile....School-ground, sixth-graders, kindergarteners, you're talking points express that level of logic. Grow up.”

You are using liberal arguments to defend a socialist system where the government plunders the politically weak (the young) to give to the politically (strong) the old.

If you wish to think that objecting to 50 million seniors having their Social Security is a liberal argument, I don't mind. Any person with far less than average intelligence can deduct that the current system sucks, but you can't just kill off 50 million seniors because you don't want to support the system the way those seniors did.

As for you trying to make the case that Seniors are more powerful than the young, you've got every person in the U.S. older than 18 and younger than 65 in one pool, and every person older than 65 in another. You honestly think here are more people over 65 than people over 18 and under 65?

This is exactly what Marxist Jesse Jackson calls for every day: Democratic Marxism, for the Feds to take from others and give to those they think is deserving.

Seniors paid into the system for 45 to 50 years. They worked hard, got their quarters in, and played by the rules. Now you're comparing them with the people Jessie Jackson promotes programs for, that haven't worked a day in their lives. What the hell is wrong with you? These two groups of people actually equate closely in your estimation?

You've probably been called worse for things you shouldn't have, but here you're being treated rather tamely for calling for the deaths of 50 million seniors, because you don't want to pay out $50 to $100 per paycheck via FICA withholding.