I think Paul’s supporters need to start asking themselves if their rabid support isn’t actually helping to nominate the worst possible candidates.
I realize that some compromises are a bridge too far but in this races there is the same old thing and there are steps in the right direction. Paul’s clinging to these races always ends with the same old thing.
True enough, CC, but for every step Paul has in the right one he runs a marathon’s worth of steps in the wrong directions (foreign policy high on that list.)
Your potential "steps in the right direction" is basically electing another Reagan - something a Palin, Perry, Cain, etc. has the potential to be.
You know what? Another president that goes to DC and slows the rate of gov't growth isn't nearly enough. The fedgov beast has to be drastically cut. Your way just delays the inevitable collapse of this nation by a few months or years.
We Ron Paul supporters proudly support the only candidate who would go to Washington sincerely and ideologically committed to real, positive change.
In the 2012 presidential election, I'm voting Ron Paul - I don't care if it's Ron Paul (R), Ron Paul (D), Ron Paul (L) or Ron Paul (write-in). No more of that "hold your nose and vote for the lesser of two evils or ????? (D) will win and ruin the country" BS for me.
In case no one's noticed, the country has been ruined for a while now. It's healing time, healing takes a doctor and you know, Ron Paul is a doctor.