What are you trying to do? Are you trying to get me to lose my temper and cuss you out so I will get banned. It's not going to happen. The moderators know who I am. They know I'm conservative, and that I'm not some liberal troll or person who's had an account before.
What are you trying to accomplish? Do you think that calling me out in threads like this is going to win me over to your side and lead me to oppose the rape exception? Hardly. All it does is make me more steadfast in my support for it. WHAT is the point of repeatedly distorting my positions and calling me a pro-abort when I have a slightly more conservative position on abortion than our most recent pro-life president? Is that what your god is telling you to do?
If you have answer to these, you can freepmail me (or don't). I won't respond in this thread again, and I won't respond in others like it.
You changed direction in order to deflect. You made a statement that was untrue. I proved it. With a link.
Oh and I asked Mesta to come. I knew she would know the truth. I was right.
Oh yeah and, I didn't ping you. I don't even really want to speak to you. I don't like you.
I am not included in whatever you are yammering about. I am ONLY here because you claimed falsely that abortion is acceptablein Judaic Law and IT IS NOT. Not ever. That was the only subject of my posts. You are using a mighty broad brush here. And then you lump me in with everyone else after you call my response drivel without answering the points of fact or the ONE question I asked you.
Do me a favor. If you are going to dis all of Judaism, do it in private. That way you will be guaranteed a free ride to posit whatever you like, true or not, and no one will question it.
“The moderators know who I am.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
They do indeed know who you are. And that puzzles me. I’ve already gone on record stating that you and the mods reached an agreement to get you un-zotted last week. You cleaned up the lies on your FReep page - they let you back. You denied it. They admitted it by their silence.
But there’s more to you being the worst agitating liberal newbie troll never to be zotted for good than I can get my mind around.
While I’m sure you and your liberal buddies take great pride in my concerns, I wonder if management knows the damage you are doing to the unity of this site.
Jim Rob likes to go off on Rudy Tooters and Mitt-bots and so the zots go flying. Whatever. What I and the FRepers you are engaging on a daily basis fear is the infiltration of Free Republic by Social Libertarians like yourself. And management stays silent and allows this.
Speaking for myself, I want no part of a Free Republic gone all liberal.
To think that FR is foolishly allowing a liberal newbie troll like you to draw a line in the sand is sad.
As mentioned earlier, I am a strong believer in the idea that the federal government should only be involved in constitutional functions. We should keep the Department of Defense and a bare-bones version of the Department of State. We should keep the Secret Service and the United States Marshals Service. We should keep the Department of Veterans Affairs but find a way to streamline it to ensure that veterans get better care.We should eliminate the Departments of Agriculture, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security (except for ICE and CBP), Interior, Labor, Justice, Transportation, and most of their subsidiary agencies.
We should eliminate the FBI, DEA, EPA, ATF, IRS, FAA, among other agencies.
We should eliminate the Federal Reserve and abolish almost all federal taxes. These can be replaced with a flat tariff with a low rate of 3 or 4%, applied to all goods entering the country.
We should consider eliminating all of the lower federal courts except for the Supreme Court.
All of the functions performed by the eliminated departments and agencies should be returned to the states, where it will be their decision as to whether they need to have similar agencies performing similar functions at the statewide level.
The federal government only has the authority to regulate three crimes under the constitution: treason, counterfeiting and piracy. Today, they have more than 4500 crimes on the books. The only position consistent with the constitution is to repeal almost all of these federal crime statutes and return the matter of prosecuting them to the states. States are the proper venue for prosecuting crimes like murder and domestic terrorism. States like New York are perfectly suited to prosecute people like Bernie Madoff, we don't need the feds interfering. Military tribunals are the proper venue for prosecuting enemy combatants.
Enough!
zot
Yes. Obviously.
They know you are Zotted.