[CharlesWayneCT]

Another rumor. I guess it has some sense to it, because it puts her past the next debate (funny how the people who argue correctly that we can’t be sure of Perry because he hasn’t been in a debate yet don’t see that as a problem for Palin). By waiting until after the debate, she can see if Perry is for real or a dud.

It would be a shame if Palin were to announce she wasn’t running, and then have Perry blow up at the debate and leave us with Romney again.

If Perry does well, maybe that will be what Palin was waiting for. Who knows. I do doubt she will announce on the 3rd, because she said she doubted she would decide by then, and I can’t imagine her using a Glenn Beck event for her announcement.

[re_nortex]

I guess it has some sense to it, because it puts her past the next debate (funny how the people who argue correctly that we can’t be sure of Perry because he hasn’t been in a debate yet don’t see that as a problem for Palin).

I think Sarah Palin's decimation of Say-it-Ain't-So Biden in the VP debate shows that she can hold her own in such a venue. On the other hand (and perhaps to your point), destroying such a feeble target is child's play. The GOP lineup is more formidable than Plugs.

[Happy Rain]

That's one of the things I like about Sarah—she does it HER way and pays no mind to either the professional nor amateur pundits.
Her detractors desperately and disingenuously assign negative motives to her behavior all the while hanging on her every statement and action like half starved lice—manipulated and frustrated,her opponents can't help but fixate on her every bit as much as her supporters do.
The woman is a genius and if she runs she wins and if she doesn't she wins—returning to a peaceful family life she probably misses as a retired national figure.