Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
All true. But this doesn’t really refute Mr. Buffett, whose main argument — that the burden of deficit-reduction should fall most heavily on the well-to-do — Mr. Golub doesn’t dispute.

No, the burden of deficit-reduction should fall most heavily on those spending the money in the first place. The problem isn't insufficient revenue. The problem is massively excessive spending.

12 posted on 08/24/2011 2:50:54 PM PDT by VRWCmember (If it wern't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VRWCmember

The problem with “spending” is that it is too vague...

Meaning, Government workers, despite how necessary are “spending” be it a cop, teacher or middle manager at the EPA.

Our immigrants come here, legally or illegally, and start draining systems they never paid into...anchor babies, refugees, asylum seekers...chain migration...are all people who are are in the red, then we pay Governement workers, for life, to hand out other people’s earnings...

End Social Security now, anyone under 55 gets to privatize their money. Put in, take out...the system has too many takers.


42 posted on 08/24/2011 3:52:43 PM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson