Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: icanhasbailout
Absolutely agreed.

However, being a trader, I look at things rather differently than non-traders.

Libyan crude does indeed flow to Europe. In the absence of Libyan crude, Euro refineries tend to run Brent, and some Urals, although -- Urals being generally sour -- this is less desirable.

No matter who ends up running Libya, that group/faction/whatever is going to have to produce and export in order to pay the bills.

And, like it or not, the WTI-Brent crude spread is going to come in (narrow from it's current $22-23 level) big time. In case you're curious, this spread, WTI-Brent, has historically run from +/- $2-3 dollars/bbl. It's now over $20/bbl.

You do the math. Not all that much difference in a barrel of Brent and a barrel of WTI. Certainly not $20 worth, eh?

Good trading to you!

85 posted on 08/21/2011 9:59:15 PM PDT by SAJ (What is the next tagline some overweening mod will censor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: SAJ

I don’t daytrade but I follow the markets along with a great many people who do, and the WTI/Brent spread has not passed beneath my notice. I agree with your analysis, the primary result of bringing more Libyan oil to market will be to reduce the spread.


90 posted on 08/22/2011 3:39:55 AM PDT by icanhasbailout (I have no argument and can't do logic so I think I will call you a noob instead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson