Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

Aren’t most, if not all, state records of private citizens, subject to privacy laws in every state? For instance, if I subpoena the Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation in my state to determine a party’s employment status in a civil/personal injury case, am I not seeking private information protected by the state? Yet, I have NEVER had the state object to my subpoenas. If an objection is raised, it invariably comes from the opposing party.


72 posted on 08/15/2011 10:42:26 AM PDT by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: STJPII

Employment status is not equivalent to a birth certificate. Hawaii has very strict privacy laws to protect their vital records. They have a duty to protect those vital records unless they’re compelled to release them by a court order. Taitz v. Astrue is a FOIA case out of D.C. that hasn’t yet progressed to discovery. Orly can’t prove she’s entitled to inspect Hawaii’s vital records simply because she filed a complaint in D.C.


73 posted on 08/15/2011 11:20:49 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson