What she should have said is “I stand by my statement. There is nobody on the face of this Earth that could do less damage to the United States of America than Barack Obama has done. I’d support a ham sandwich against Obama. Anyone But Obama.”
Thereby standing by her statement like a real, confident leader yet equating Romney to a ham sandwich thereby appeasing her supporters.
This “what I meant was” stuff is not encouraging.
We have to remember how much money gets spent on media in elections, and ‘12 is going to be way crazier than ‘08.
Let’s say Perry, for whatever reasons, is a shoo-in. That meaning 53.7 of Americans have decided to vote him in, even
this early.
That leaves no silly season and all the spending that goes with it. No way is the LSM going to let that happen.
“Thereby standing by her statement like a real, confident leader yet equating Romney to a ham sandwich thereby appeasing her supporters.”
Sarah Palin would totally lose me if she equated Romney to a ham sandwich. I like ham sandwiches, and so do my dogs.
Weak.
She said anyone but Obama... Nuff said. Just because a dishonest "reporter" ran with it... What do you expect? Ever say anything wherein you could not have extrapolated? Made yourself more clear?
Must be nice to be you eh?... Primadonna.