It got the subject out there (and Michele answered it super-well, based on what Christian submission in marriage really is), so that when the evil anti-Christian leftists go after her on it, she's already dealt with it.
Maybe?? :)
You could be right about that.
Non-believers have absolutely no understanding of what submission in that sense means. They see it in literal simplistic terms because they have no understanding or context about the bible to work from.
Submission after all, is what Liberals want from the electorate. They want complete power over our lives. Submission is exactly what they have gotten from entitlements. So that is the premise they approach it from.
I agree that the submission question needed to be asked. It’s very relevant to the idea of a woman being president. Did she answer well. I’d give her a B. She explained within the context of their marriage, but she did not relate her answer to holding the office of Pres. She needed to have made that clearer. Would another woman, say Hillary Clinton, be asked that? No. But we conservatives live our values, that is why these questions come about, and why they must be answered properly. She did okay, IMHO. Rick S. was much clearer and firmer on the values issues. Cain as well. Both grew in my esteem. Newt has great political wisdom but not much in the morals area. I can’t get past that. Others candidates? What others? Rick Perry was a cheerleader for Texas A&M. Not sure that’s an erasable image for me.
That’s what I thought at the time. And like you, still think.
Trust that they never let up on Christian values....never....!