To: drewh
Test Question:
How would have one armed citizen changed this situation?
Be prepared to discuss belt fed weapons.
17 posted on
08/09/2011 10:36:18 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: 2banana
“Be prepared to discuss belt fed weapons”
Well, it would be hard to chase on foot after the looters with such a heavy weapon. I would prefer mobility over entrenchment. However, If you could mount a .50 cal on your pickup truck, that might be useful.
33 posted on
08/09/2011 10:44:56 AM PDT by
TexasRepublic
(Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
To: 2banana
How would have one armed citizen changed this situation? Be prepared to discuss belt fed weapons.
Or Claymore. The ultimate way to say "Get off my lawn."
34 posted on
08/09/2011 10:44:56 AM PDT by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: 2banana
In the UK, it wouldnt.
He would be charged with murder..........
35 posted on
08/09/2011 10:45:12 AM PDT by
Red Badger
("Treason doth never prosper.... What's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.")
To: 2banana
Even against a mob, a single pistol would be useful. I doubt any of the thugs are willing to be the first ones to die. They’re cowards. At the first shot they’d beat feet for the door. But sure... a beltfed weapon would be handy.
38 posted on
08/09/2011 10:48:43 AM PDT by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: 2banana
68 posted on
08/09/2011 12:02:52 PM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Be prepared. It's a hard rain's that's gonna fall.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson