Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/03/2011 10:11:10 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bruinbirdman
sudden and severe tightening of fiscal policy

What planet is this yokel from?

2 posted on 08/03/2011 10:18:09 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Apparently these theorists idea of “austerity” is turning down a third helping.


3 posted on 08/03/2011 10:19:29 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Why do They hate her so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Get government and the “theorists” off our backs and out of our way. Let Dr. Sowell and Dr. Williams lead us out of the wilderness!


4 posted on 08/03/2011 10:19:57 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

“Current fiscal policy is unsustainable”

The money quote for the western economies.


7 posted on 08/03/2011 11:00:17 PM PDT by oldbrowser (They're socialists don't call them liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Once again a very interesting piece by Ambrose. Where else in MSM do you read things like this:

The Alesina school cites a string of cases where fiscal cuts led to robust recovery, and a few booms. Their work cannot be dismissed lightly and exposes the limits of New Keynesian models, which often clash with historical reality and human behaviour.

The textbook cases are: Italy (1970s); Ireland, Denmark and Sweden (1980s); Canada, Spain and the UK (1990s). There were some flops, too: Finland (1970s), Australia, Belgium and Greece (1980s), and Italy (1990s). Context is crucial. Dr Alesina says one clear message comes through from the stack of evidence: "Tax increases are much worse for the economy than spending cuts."

(NB: The case of Sweden was in the early 90s not the 80s!)

A theoretical reason for spending (increaseas or) cuts having less effects than tax cuts is the fact that the latter come into effect much quicker. That was the case during the Great Depression, at least in Sweden, when Sweden was well on its way to recovery well before the Kensyian policies of our Labour party got into effect. (Though, in that case it was not so much tax cuts, as depreciation of the currency due to Sweden leaving the Gold standard that helped to lift the economy).

8 posted on 08/03/2011 11:19:22 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

“known as an “expansionary fiscal contraction”

Sounds vaguely similar to the dreaded “Cranio-Rectal Inversion” and just as fearsome.


10 posted on 08/04/2011 2:02:01 AM PDT by Artie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Here's a theory for you:

Stop spending what you don't earn.

11 posted on 08/04/2011 3:54:11 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority (Where is the middle ground on insolvency of the United States government?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

“Former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers said there is now a one-third chance of a full-blown recession next year in the US. Nobel leaureate Paul Krugman said obscurantists had run amok”

OK if these two say we’re on the wrong track, we must be going in the right direction. Summers and Krugman are the worse ever economists.


12 posted on 08/04/2011 4:26:30 AM PDT by y6162
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Leftist pointy headed elitist psuedo intellectualism mostly.

In 1984 36 task forces and their sub groups lead by 161 of the nations best CEO’s studied the Federal Government for months and concluded that as much as one -third of the Federal Budget consisted of waste, fraud and abuse. Congress of course took no action on the Grace Commission report and its predictions of more than $13Trillion in national debt have now come true

The elimination of waste is never bad economic policy. A government that lives within its means and intrudes on private sector actions as little as possible would be nourishing to enterprise not destructive of it.

Low taxes and low regulation stimulate productive economic activity (and “jobs”) by increasing private investment. (Investment not “consumer demand” creates growth; e.g. Apple Ipad and Iphone had to be created before anyone bought one)

Government debt is nothing more than a hidden tax, another parasitic burden on the national economy.

Bleating hearts of desparate leftists are inventing focus group tested “scenarios” to try and justify their failed status quo. The nation knows they are frauds, only our failed institutions, leftist dominated government and a corrupt and ignorant media establishment continue to manuever to retain power behind stupid theories and empty rhetoric.


13 posted on 08/04/2011 4:49:10 AM PDT by Gail Wynand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson