[Lakeshark]

Do you think the bill would be anywhere near what was passed if the TEA party candidates had not been there?

Obama and the dems wanted to raise taxes now and actually spend more, so how is this not "a step in the right direction"?

She only repeated Greta's word "victory" and only used in in the context of the debate. I'm not suggesting this was a good deal, and neither was she. The author and the Palin bashers here misconstrue the discussion she and Greta had, listen for yourself.

[Justice]

"Obama and the dems wanted to raise taxes now and actually spend more, so how is this not "a step in the right direction"?"

This bill IS a step in the right direction...Palin is correct.

It is a partial victory.

"listen for yourself."

I listened very carefully. She said the "actions taken this week" meaning the debt bill were a partial victory or a step in the right direction.

[Clyde5445]

Well, I think Sarah can speak for herself so I posted the TRANSCRIPT for all to see.

It’s amazing some people don’t realize Fox provide transcripts to interviews.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2757719/posts

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/on-the-record/transcript/palin-hits-back-biden-saying-tea-party-acted-039terrorists039-during-debt-debate

[RINOs suck]

Obama and the dems wanted to raise taxes now and actually spend more, so how is this not "a step in the right direction"?

Taxes could still be raised if the "super committee" deems it necessary. The Bush tax cuts or other tax loopholes may be closed, effectively raising taxes. AND, WE ARE SPENDING SIGNIFICANTLY MORE. The "cuts" are a reduction in the increase that may never actually happen and after trillions more have been added to the debt.

Only Sarah Palin could compel someone to make a conservative come up with a spin like this.

Are you getting dizzy from doing all that spinning?