That same articles resorts to a couple of miracles, and oodles of assumptions along the way, and in my book even that isn’t enough.
And you wonder how did Noah go about getting the American Buffalo from America that no one knew about or Australian Kangaroo and all the insects that hadn’t been discovered yet.
Sorry Brandt... you’re free to believe what you want, but creationists are a loooooooong way from making a scientific case out of their beliefs.
http://www.mightydrake.com/Rants/CaseAgainstCreationism.htm
http://www.bidstrup.com/creation.htm
Well when the evolution position is dissected it also shows oodles of assumptions and miracles. Miracles mind you that have no explanation and no author
just POOF there it is the single cell, no
wait POOF the cambrian explosion of mutiple never before seen life-forms.
On the other hand if you were to sincerely try to read and
understand the Bible you would be left affirming that the
Words therein had to be inspired by an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-seeing creator God.
You could start by exploring bible prophecy - say Psalm 22
which portrays Jesus Christ’s crucified. Psalm 22 was written approx 1,000 years before Jesus walked the Earth.
Any honest scholarly review of both ‘theories’ will show 2 things:
Neither is true hard science, and
Far more evidence favors short ages and the creation model.
You’re links show just how little you are/were willing to read the ‘opposition.’ My links refuted your links and your links doe not even quote the Bible accurately. Seems like your links are doing 2 unscientific things:
Outright lying, mis-quoting, and mis-representing creation, &
Providing no other source material for their rather thin conjectures.
You should look up the definition for brain-washing.
I’m not surprised in the least, but at least I can say I
read your links.