Any honest scholarly review of both ‘theories’ will show 2 things:
Neither is true hard science, and
Far more evidence favors short ages and the creation model.
You’re links show just how little you are/were willing to read the ‘opposition.’ My links refuted your links and your links doe not even quote the Bible accurately. Seems like your links are doing 2 unscientific things:
Outright lying, mis-quoting, and mis-representing creation, &
Providing no other source material for their rather thin conjectures.
You should look up the definition for brain-washing.
I’m not surprised in the least, but at least I can say I
read your links.
Again, you keep harping against evolution as though showing its shortcomings proves creationism.
Forget about evolution and make your case for creationism using evidence. But since you cannot state what the theory is, it’s hard to make a case for it. I got my problems with evolution as well, but I have even more problems with creationism - maybe there’s a better theory waiting to be discovered.
The report you sent me about Noah’s is full of presuppositions - it could be this or this could have happened this way. There’s no evidence, a few miracles, and many unsubstantiated assumptions.
The thing with creationism, is that if you accept it you have to deny not just evolution, but geology, astronomy, genetics, biology, and other branches of science.
As for Psalm 22 that you claim predicted the crucifixion of Jesus, that is your interpretation. The jews who believe in the old testament don’t seem to share that. Again, it’s belief not evidence.
I don’t think either one of us is going to convince the other.... But I wish you well.