Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wtc911; EternalVigilance

The tag line was from Eternal responding to your post. Since you were both PDSers, you both got my post. I will anxiously await either of you telling me which candidate has made anything close to the ridiculous “expectation” you noted:

“She had the chance on national TV to talk about the horror of abortion, the evil of killing the unborn, the stain on America’s soul; but she didn’t and never has.”

And for the Obummer didn’t abort his daughters, so he must be anti abortion analogy, you need to take a course in logic or better yet, common sense.

Do please tell us your candidates, or are you scared.


206 posted on 07/28/2011 9:24:53 AM PDT by secondamendmentkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]


To: secondamendmentkid
Please explain exactly why you think that posting Palin's (™) own words can be a negative.

Oh, here are some more...

Q: If Roe v. Wade were overturned and states could once again prohibit abortion, in your view, to what extent should abortion be prohibited in Alaska?

A: Under this hypothetical scenario, it would not be up to the governor to unilaterally ban anything. It would be up to the people of Alaska to discuss and decide how we would like our society to reflect our values.

Source: Anchorage Daily News: 2006 gubernatorial candidate profile Oct 22, 2006"

I get it, Palin(™) herself wouldn't have an abortion but it's ok if the people decide it's ok. Where have we heard that position before? Oh, I know...every Catholic Democrat politician from Kennedy to Cuomo (and very likely, Pontius Pilate).

215 posted on 07/28/2011 10:49:20 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson