Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers
Palin appeared on the show in the aftermath of a premeditated campaign of character assassination, and the show was likely enough to appeal to those most likely to be in sympathy with her should she decide to run for office in the future: working- and middle-class families with outdoorsy tastes.

That is all well and good. That doesn't mean she couldn't have told TLC that she didn't want to appear with an idiot like Kate Gosselin and her eight kids. That turned the whole program into ploy to get ratings by any means necessary.

Can you imagine Ronald Reagan doing something like that in the late 1970s?

And all that publicity, not only at no cost to Sarah Palin, but apparently putting money in her pocket: I have read she was paid $1 million / episode.

If her goal was making money, fine. But, don't pretend all that isn't going to be a weapon used like a sledgehammer against her if she decides to run.

127 posted on 07/25/2011 3:37:53 PM PDT by RINOs suck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: RINOs suck
And it will likely backfire on whosoever may try it.

Palin is going for the box office, not the critics.

And the kind who would sniff at having Gosselin on board, likely wouldn't vote for Palin anyway.

All the neutral and leaning GOP will likely blow that off.

Cheers!

131 posted on 07/25/2011 6:40:19 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

To: RINOs suck
If her goal was making money, fine. But, don't pretend all that isn't going to be a weapon used like a sledgehammer against her if she decides to run.

All the candidates have book deals.

So what that she made the Alaska TV show during what would have been her summer vacation. That is just a small sample of what she has accomplished since she resigned.

More importantly, Palin has been leading the fight, wielding the "sledgehammer", against Obama and the Democrats over the last 18 months, in speeches, in TV appearances, on the internet, and with endorsements for candidates in the last election cycle. She also made appearances for the Arizona Illegal Immigration Bill and the Wisconsin Anti Union Bill while all the others, for example Rick Perry, ran in the other direction. I could go on.

And as far as you guessing what Palin's goal was, why are you guessing? Here's what Palin stated.

I think she has lived up to her stated goal and I'm glad she made the move.

And if she chooses to run for president, and if it turns out that all of her activity over the last two years was in preparation for a presidential run, then the Andrew Jackson parallel holds.

132 posted on 07/25/2011 7:20:47 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

To: RINOs suck
Can you imagine Ronald Reagan doing something like that in the late 1970s?

You just illustrated my point despite yourself.

Reagan was constantly villified and belittled as a "B" grade actor (Death Valley Days, Bedtime for Bonzo) even though it'd been more than a decade since he had filmed them.

So the attacks have and will and do go further back in the past than just ("late-70s to 1980") or the equivalent for Palin.

But -- despite the ubiquity of the attacks -- they rolled off.

People wanted America to succeed after Carter: and when Reagan's policies worked, the people said, "BFD!" to the affected criticism.

Cheers!

136 posted on 07/25/2011 8:07:18 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson