Skip to comments.
Rick Perry For President? Meet 24 Billionaires Who've Backed Him
Forbes ^
| July 20, 2011
| Clare O'Connor
Posted on 07/20/2011 12:28:59 PM PDT by Clairity
In a federal race like the presidency, each donor can only give $2,500 per candidate. However, there's nothing stopping powerful 'bundlers' from collecting checks from their rich friends. President Obama is already taking advantage of these super - donors: billionaire Democrats including Penny Pritzker and Marc Benioff have already raised hundreds of thousands for the reelection campaign. Perry must be hoping his past billionaire donors will do the same. Per Texas state disclosure records:
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.forbes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bilderbergers; billionaires; donors; elections; palin; perry; perry2012; rickperry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-126 next last
To: Paladin2
I got ya. But we are also known by the company we keep. It isn’t possible to be able to know everyone we associate with. The best you can do is not make the same mistakes over and over.
21
posted on
07/20/2011 1:20:45 PM PDT
by
dforest
To: McGruff
My congressman defeated an incumbent democrat on less than half the money raised by democrats. $8 million raised by democrats vs $3.5 million raised by the GOP.
The “conventional wisdom” house of cards is collapsing.
22
posted on
07/20/2011 1:21:40 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: cripplecreek
Just last week some unfortunate fool posted a vanity that suggested that we should all support Mitt Romney because hes rich.It does make about as much sense as supporting Rick Perry because he has a lot of billionaire friends, doesn't it?
23
posted on
07/20/2011 1:22:33 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Clairity
These billionaires better step it up if Perry runs or they won’t be billionaires for much longer
24
posted on
07/20/2011 1:24:06 PM PDT
by
PMAS
To: Clairity
Pleased to meet you Mr. Billionaires, glad you could make it.
25
posted on
07/20/2011 1:30:32 PM PDT
by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
To: Vigilanteman
Guess I’m just not impressed with people who are for sale and see the presidency as something that can be bought.
Just the other day someone was covering for Steve Wynn by saying that he’s just covering his bases by supporting both democrats and republicans. In my opinion, they shouldn’t see giving to either side as advantageous.
26
posted on
07/20/2011 1:31:55 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: SoConPubbie
Sarah Palin doesn't live on the border of Mexico. She has no idea what the hell she is talking about when she makes that statement.
By the way, Palin joined a bunch of Democrats in Alaska to pass basically a windfall tax on oil companies because she said "the Alaska Constitution states Alaska's resources are the people's"
Really? So who is providing all those high paying jobs to the citizens of Alaska and why oh why was there not a tax on the fishing industry? Big money in fishing going to a handful of boat owners.
How can she say Obama shouldn't put a windfall on "Big Oil" but she can and I wonder how her husband would have appreciated a nice big tax on his livelihood, fishing Alaska's waters for an Alaskan natural resource to sell for profit.
27
posted on
07/20/2011 1:37:37 PM PDT
by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
To: normy
Sarah Palin doesn't live on the border of Mexico. She has no idea what the hell she is talking about when she makes that statement.
Sorry, Red Herring.
You don't have to live on the border to know how to deal with this issue. Two things need to be done to deal with this very effectively and Sarah is in support of both of them and Rick Perry is against both of them:
1. At the Federal Level: Physical fence along the complete border.
2. At the State Level: Implement laws like AZ1070.
To: normy; Al B.; gov_bean_ counter
By the way, Palin joined a bunch of Democrats in Alaska to pass basically a windfall tax on oil companies because she said "the Alaska Constitution states Alaska's resources are the people's"
Well, the Alaska Constitution does say that. Is states that the resources are the property not of the state, but of the citizens of the state. Pretty simple concept.
To: SoConPubbie
So you and Palin would put a fence on our side of Texas/Mexico border thus limiting American and Texan access to the Rio Grande. That’s why in Texas, it’s a stupid idea. Bottom line.I won’t cede Texas property or American property to Mexico.
30
posted on
07/20/2011 1:44:52 PM PDT
by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
To: SoConPubbie
Good, then Palin should have put a windfall on the logging and fishing industries too.
31
posted on
07/20/2011 1:46:14 PM PDT
by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
To: normy; Al B.; gov_bean_ counter
and why oh why was there not a tax on the fishing industry? Big money in fishing going to a handful of boat owners.
How can she say Obama shouldn't put a windfall on "Big Oil" but she can and I wonder how her husband would have appreciated a nice big tax on his livelihood, fishing Alaska's waters for an Alaskan natural resource to sell for profit.
I don't know, you'd have to ask Governor Palin, and the Republicans and Democrats who supported the bill and voted for it.
BTW, you do know that the bill passed by I believe a margin of 59 to 1, right?
So trying to use the statement she teamed up with Democrats as some type of knock on her is rather ineffective and falls into the area of propaganda.
To: normy
So you and Palin would put a fence on our side of Texas/Mexico border thus limiting American and Texan access to the Rio Grande. Thats why in Texas, its a stupid idea. Bottom line.I wont cede Texas property or American property to Mexico.
Yes I would, but you are putting up another Red Herring, because you could have a fence on our side of the Rio Grande and still give access to American Citizens to the River.
It is not an either/or situation.
To: normy
You just stated what I have been thinking about a physical border fence. It would restrict Texans, their cattle and our game animals from that water. I am not suggesting we do nothing and I am not suggesting I have a plan but that land right up to the center of the Rio Grande belongs to Texans.
34
posted on
07/20/2011 1:51:03 PM PDT
by
Ditter
To: SoConPubbie
So she did team up with Dems and passed a bill taxing job creators in the natural resource industries(just not all, like Todd’s business) and then quit after doing it, retiring with an 80% approval rating halfway through her first term by giving $1200 dollar checks out. How conservative of her, oh and she thinks ceding the Rio Grand to the Mexicans is a fine idea, at least according to you.
35
posted on
07/20/2011 1:51:53 PM PDT
by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
To: SoConPubbie
Here's what he said in Mexico city:
“I dont think this is that difficult an issue if Congress would have the maturity to sit down and really discuss it and cut out all the mean rhetoric, Perry said during a break in the third day of meetings with Mexican officials and business executives.”
Not speaking specifically about any particular bill.
We need those individuals to continue to grow our economy, he said of Texas undocumented workers, most of whom hail from Mexico. The vast, vast majority of those individuals want to come and work and take care of their families.
Sound to me like he wants to allow more workers to come from Mexico legally. Again shifting the focus to Washington.
Hispanics are miffed at obama because he hasn't delivered on his campaign promises and has deported nearly a million.
Might be a good time for a border Governor to take the lead?
36
posted on
07/20/2011 1:54:30 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: Ditter
I don't suggest do nothing either and I think if Arizona or New Mexico want a fence, go for it but to have people 3000 miles away tell us a border fence in Texas is a must or your some open borders Rino is what comes out a bulls ass.
37
posted on
07/20/2011 1:57:29 PM PDT
by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
To: The Bronze Titan
He’s not Cuban, duffus
He just this year signed into law a voter ID measure and requirement of proof of citizenship to get a TX DL.
That’s a couple of *things* .
38
posted on
07/20/2011 1:58:28 PM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: Vigilanteman
Correct. My impression of Rick Perry is only a little better than my impression of Mitt Romney or George Bush-- they might be nice guys. But they are definitely RINO's. The fact that Sarah Palin was courteous to him means nothing more than the fact that she was also courteous to Juan McCain. Hight accurate and sensible interpretation of the facts.
Just because Sarah didn't call PRIC Rick something along the lines of "windsock" doesn't make it so. That is just Sarah being a smart team leader.
.
39
posted on
07/20/2011 2:01:05 PM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: Ditter
If the people up north wanting a fence want it bad enough we would have to build it in Mexico and form a demilitarized zone and risk war and sanctions.
40
posted on
07/20/2011 2:02:15 PM PDT
by
normy
(Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-126 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson