Posted on 07/19/2011 1:45:00 PM PDT by tobyhill
President Barack Obama said Tuesday that a proposal offered by Republican and Democratic senators is a very significant step that represents the potential for bipartisan consensus on resolving the impasse over cutting the deficit and raising the debt ceiling.
In an appearance in the White House briefing room, Obama urged congressional leaders to embrace the Gang of Six proposal, which would slash the deficit by $3.7 trillion over 10 years, in part by raising about $1 trillion in new revenue.
We have a Democratic president and administration that is prepared to sign a tough package that includes both spending cuts, modifications to Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare that would strengthen those systems and allow them to move forward, and would include a revenue component, Obama said. We now have a bipartisan group of senators who agree with that balanced approach. And weve got the American people who agree with that balanced approach.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
“Lot of promised spending cuts. 1 trillion in new revenue. Ive seen this movie before. Heres a spoiler: new taxes stay, spending cuts go away in the next congress. No deal.”............
I agree, NO DEAL!. Spending cuts are nothing more than not spending anymore than what is already planned. They are not CUTS at all. New revenue means nothing but MORE, increased taxes. They don’t care where that money comes from just so they get it. The Dems will distort their plan, lie and cheat but in the end, we will be screwed.
If the GOP caves, they're dead, politically.
So let me get this straight:
In order to appear like the grown up, he actually said “We have a Democratic President and administration...?” What is the purpose of this particular wording? Is it to act as an impartial player just reporting the “facts” all while being a key figure?
So let me get this straight:
In order to appear like the grown up, he actually said “We have a Democratic President and administration...?” What is the purpose of this particular wording? Is it to act as an impartial player just reporting the “facts” all while being a key figure?
If the House passes this POS we are moving to France.
GANG OF SIX proposal is no proposed legislation at all-—enormously complicated. Translating the proposal, it merely directs committees to recommend proposals.
The President has added more debt than all previous presidents combined.
paraphrasing Sen. Rand Paul on Hannity radio-
GANG OF SIX proposal-—another deceptive circle fest.
Bookmarked....so we remember...
I'm willing to call Obama's bluff. No more borrowing. I've had it!!! Live with the boatload of $$$$ you're already ripping us off for. ENOUGH is ENOUGH!
Congressional bipartisan “gang of whatever”, run for the hills.
As the Washington Examiner points out, it’s actually more like a $3 trillion tax increase:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2750868/posts?page=2
(They used a baseline assumption of the Bush tax cuts expiring for a $4.8 trillion increase, so if you count from the current level they’re actually jacking taxes up by over $3 trillion. (Though they claim a savings of $1.5 trillion, because they compare it against that $4.8 trillion Bush tax repeal.)
....kills the home interest deduction....
Well there goes more equity. I guess when we’re all living in the projects begging for food stamps that the bastards will be happy.
Wasn’t that what Tip O’Neil did to Reagan?
Lucy and Charlie Brown again. Do you get the idea that almost no one is representing working middle class Americans?
I am ashamed that Chambliss is from GA. I just dropped him my not so pleasant thoughts on the matter.
I am with you on the move to France.
You know that is what I keep saying but I keep seeing these bills originate in the Senate.
Increase in housing number today was the building of multi-family homes. RENTALS. If you own your own home condider yourself screwed. You will never be able to sell it.
Guess they’ll have to pass it to find out what’s in it. This is another last-minute sucker punch for the Republic. This is why the $hit-head rinos need to leave. What is so tragic and fearful about shrinking the size of the government and doing it today insead of ten years from now?
“Increase in housing number today was the building of multi-family homes. RENTALS. If you own your own home condider yourself screwed. You will never be able to sell it.”
Great.
Our equity is wiped out (thanks, Barney, Fannie, & Freddie).
If we can’t sell it, maybe we’ll have to turn it into a boarding house, LOL.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.