Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: matthew fuller

I hope that the jurors don’t suffer at all.

They did their job, and it was a hard, thankless job to do. I think she was guilty, too, but I didn’t sit in the jury box. And that’s the important thing at the end of the day.

I find it interesting that the 12 people who sat through the whole trial and saw the evidence without a media filter set her free.

People who saw it through the media filter saw what the media wanted them to see. The jury got both sides and made a unanimous decision which was far different than what most who didn’t get their view wanted.

What might that say about the media? And what does it say about everyone who thinks they “know” how this trial was supposed to go?, including me?


68 posted on 07/16/2011 10:50:38 PM PDT by mountainbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: mountainbunny; matthew fuller

I find it interesting that the 12 people who sat through the whole trial and saw the evidence without a media filter set her free.

People who saw it through the media filter saw what the media wanted them to see.

- - - - - - -
Not entirely true. I (and I know others) who watched the trial via live stream with NO media info (I don’t even have TV). I watched the whole trial and would have found her guilty, and been a hold out. My husband also watched it (again without media) and as an attorney, thought the case was solid enough for a conviction. He is outraged.

Our only explanation is the jurors were lazy. Now they are making excuses.


78 posted on 07/16/2011 10:57:36 PM PDT by reaganaut (Ex-Mormon, now Christian - "I once was lost, but now am found; was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: mountainbunny
"I find it interesting that the 12 people who sat through the whole trial and saw the evidence without a media filter set her free."

I agree with you as far as witholding judgement on the jurors, since I didn't hear what they heard. However, it's undisputed that this bitch partied for thirty-one days after her daughter was missing/dead. No loving mother does that, period. All I can say is, I know how I would have voted.

81 posted on 07/16/2011 11:00:29 PM PDT by matthew fuller (Forget impeachment- Extradite obama, biden, napolitano, muller, clinton and holder. Country saved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: mountainbunny

No offense, but you don’t know what you are talking about.


141 posted on 07/17/2011 3:55:16 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Casey Anthony is guilty as hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: mountainbunny; reaganaut

“What might that say about the media? And what does it say about everyone who thinks they “know” how this trial was supposed to go?, including me?”

I spoke to a couple of friends who are detectives in the I.D. Bureau of a local police department. One of them raised the point that now, thanks to shows like “C.S.I.”, juries expect a case to be wrapped up, cut-and-dried, in the space of an hour. ( they both thought that the evidence in this case should have convicted her.) I thought that was an interesting point.


266 posted on 07/17/2011 9:42:25 AM PDT by SoKatt ("Change" is not a strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson