“There was plenty of evidence.”
Yes, I understand you sat through every hour of the trial. You heard all of the evidence so what’s wrong with these stupid jurors... /S
I am sure you have not.
First of all, by your own so-called logic, since you certainly did not sit through every hour of the trial and hear all the evidence, you have no justification to have an opinion in the matter, pro or con. So you shouldn't be talking at all.
Second of all, your argument (which is actually a bumper-sticker meme) is, in fact, merely an abuse of critical thinking. It isn't every hour at the trial, all the transcripts, and being there in person, in the jury room, that matters. It is the review of established evidence that is contradictory, and for which no reasonable explanation has been supplied, but which can easily establish knowledge, manslaughter and even murder, which has been left unanswered by a manipulation of the court process, which millions of people are looking at here. No one denies that this is how our legal process works. No on except apologist shills, however, demand that people dumb themselves down to believe that justice was served, and that their own common sense and clear thinking is somehow faulty because they dare see the hypocrisy of the non-answers and lies they've been fed.
In other words, go ahead and put your money where your meme is, and hire Casey to babysit YOUR kids - but leave the rest of sane America out of it.