At least one person has their head screwed on right down there.
Posted on 07/12/2011 4:02:31 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
Though a recent Gallup poll found that nearly two-thirds of America believes that Casey Anthony was guilty of murder, one of her defense attorneys considers himself squarely in the minority on that topic. "I do believe her story," defense attorney Cheney Mason told TODAY's Savannah Guthrie on Monday. "I believed it from the first time I met her"...
Mason said he met with Anthony in her home weeks before he officially became a member of the defense team...
(Excerpt) Read more at today.msnbc.msn.com ...
The evidence clearly was enough to convict on the aggravated manslaughter charge.
Clearwater is overrun by Scientologists. Their headquarters takes up a lot of downtown space.
Whoa yeah. Pinellas County is a very “blue” county in Florida.
>>> Maybe you should consider the “FACTS”, before you just post BS.
We don’t need facts. This is yet another “Let’s get a rope” thread. Facts aren’t as much fun.
That’s the thing with these soap opera trials.
Good one. EOO. Me too.
whoops, meant, I was trying to be “discrete”....not, indiscrete.
Down Simba!
At least one person has their head screwed on right down there.
Cheney Mason: Liar for Hire
You like the verdict of NOT GUILTY, so why are you here? You won't change anyone's mind, and they won't change yours.
Yep, that’s what I think too. Really angered me to think that Casey got away with murdering her little girl because a bunch of air heads were on the jury.
To rain on your Parade.
I read about the Scientologist presence in Clearwater during the Terry Schiavo case.
But did the system work? If some on the jury, as has been reported, sometimes slept/stared off into space through portions on the prosecutor speaking in the past, didn’t take notes, etc, etc, then did the system work?
These broadbrush stroke, sweeping generalizations that no matter the verdict, “the system works” are getting old.
Alot of these people who say the system worked, would not be saying that if a murder 1 verdict was rendered. Not because of the verdict, but only because they are opposed to the death penalty.
Which makes me wonder if some jury members were so p-od at the prosecutor going after murder 1 that they didn’t even render the lowest possible of the three verdicts possible (aside from counts 4-7).
Surely not!!!
Surely not what??? And don’t call me Surely ;)
If what you are saying is true...
Client: “I did nothing wrong, I am innocent. These aren’t the droids you are looking for.”
Lawyer: “Yes you are, and these aren’t the droids...”
They say that jedi mind tricks work on the weak-minded. Maybe she is sith, and maybe Mason is weak minded? Nah, she isn’t....maybe Cheney is just weak minded...
He might have met her at her home. Not saying he didn’t. But where is the proof?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.