But did the system work? If some on the jury, as has been reported, sometimes slept/stared off into space through portions on the prosecutor speaking in the past, didn’t take notes, etc, etc, then did the system work?
These broadbrush stroke, sweeping generalizations that no matter the verdict, “the system works” are getting old.
Alot of these people who say the system worked, would not be saying that if a murder 1 verdict was rendered. Not because of the verdict, but only because they are opposed to the death penalty.
Which makes me wonder if some jury members were so p-od at the prosecutor going after murder 1 that they didn’t even render the lowest possible of the three verdicts possible (aside from counts 4-7).
That could be a part of it. (some jury members were so p-od at the prosecutor going after murder 1 that they didn’t even render the lowest possible of the three verdicts possible)
I’m not against the death penalty, but I just couldn’t give Casey the death penalty with the evidence the prosecution presented- and especially with creepy George with his ‘selective memory’, his dishonesty brought to light (in denying an affair with the Cruz woman when his actions and emails indicated otherwise) and the lying Cindy.
They all acted suspicious to me.
As I said, I think Casey accidentally caused the child’s death, panicked, put the body in bags in the trunk, began partying frantically to ‘forget’. (this is how some immature, twisted people act) At a later date, George and Cindy found out but agreed at this late date to cover it all up to save Casey from a murder 1.
I still think the system worked.
A person is innocent until proven guilty.
The prosecution just did not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
At any rate, we need to get back to business. We have an election to win.
If we don’t get the Marxist/Muslim usurper out of the White House, we may one day not have a judicial system or anything else to argue about.