Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unknown Unknowns (Thomas Sowell)
Creators Syndicate ^ | July 12, 2011 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 07/11/2011 1:25:22 PM PDT by jazusamo

 

When Donald Rumsfeld was Secretary of Defense, he coined some phrases about knowledge that apply far beyond military matters.

Secretary Rumsfeld pointed out that there are some things that we know that we know. He called those "known knowns." We may, for example, know how many aircraft carriers some other country has. We may also know that they have troops and tanks, without knowing how many. In Rumsfeld's phrase, that would be an "unknown known" — a gap in our knowledge that we at least know exists.

Finally, there are things we don't even know exist, much less anything about them. These are "unknown unknowns" — and they are the most dangerous. We had no clue, for example, when dawn broke on September 11, 2001, that somebody was going to fly two commercial airliners into the World Trade Center that day.

There are similar kinds of gaps in our knowledge in the economy. Unfortunately, our own government creates uncertainties that can paralyze the economy, especially when these uncertainties take the form of "unknown unknowns."

The short-run quick fixes that seem so attractive to so many politicians, and to many in the media, create many unknowns that make investors reluctant to invest and employers reluctant to employ. Politicians may only look as far ahead as the next election, but investors have to look ahead for as many years as it will take for their investments to start bringing in some money.

The net result is that both our financial institutions and our businesses have had record amounts of cash sitting idle while millions of people can't find jobs. Ordinarily these institutions make money by investing money and hiring workers. Why not now?

Because numerous and unpredictable government interventions create many unknowns, including "unknown unknowns."

The quick fix that got both Democrats and Republicans off the hook with a temporary bipartisan tax compromise, several months ago, leaves investors uncertain as to what the tax rate will be when any money they invest today starts bringing in a return in another two or three or ten years. It is known that there will be taxes but nobody knows what the tax rate will be then.

Some investors can send their investment money to foreign countries, where the tax rate is already known, is often lower than the tax rate in the United States and — perhaps even more important — is not some temporary, quick-fix compromise that is going to expire before their investments start earning a return.

Although more foreign investments were coming into the United States, a few years ago, than there were American investments going to foreign countries, today it is just the reverse. American investors are sending more of their money out of the country than foreign investors are sending here.

Since 2009, according to the Wall Street Journal, "the U.S. has lost more than $200 billion in investment capital." They add: "That is the equivalent of about two million jobs that don't exist on these shores and are now located in places like China, Germany and India."

President Obama's rhetoric deplores such "outsourcing," but his administration's policies make outsourcing an ever more attractive alternative to investing in the United States and creating American jobs.

Blithely piling onto American businesses both known costs like more taxes and unknowable costs — such as the massive ObamaCare mandates that are still evolving — provides more incentives for investors to send their money elsewhere to escape the hassles.

Hardly a month goes by without this administration coming up with a new anti-business policy — whether directed against Boeing, banks or other private enterprises. Neither investors nor employers can know when the next one is coming or what it will be. These are unknown unknowns.

Such anti-business policies would just be business' problem, except that it is businesses that create jobs.

The biggest losers from creating an adverse business climate may not be businesses themselves — especially not big businesses, which can readily invest more of their money overseas. The biggest losers are likely to be working people in America, who cannot just relocate to Europe or Asia to take the jobs created there by American multinational corporations.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: sowell; thomassowell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: GeronL

You bet. It starts at 28 seconds if you don’t want to watch the whole thing. :-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWt8hTayupE


21 posted on 07/11/2011 5:10:10 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DFG

The wife bought Rumsfeld’s book some time back and read it. I’ve been putting it off but really have to get into it because I’ve always admired him, he’s a patriot, IMHO.


22 posted on 07/11/2011 5:14:26 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Amen, FRiend. It’s the camels nose under the tent that the tyrants fear.


23 posted on 07/11/2011 5:18:12 PM PDT by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

bump


24 posted on 07/11/2011 5:22:45 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Rumsfeld’s book is worth reading.

I have always admired Rumsfeld as well. Wish we had more like him.


25 posted on 07/11/2011 5:23:59 PM PDT by DFG (Can We Bankrupt The Country? YES WE CAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“Read Sowell’s econ books, then you’ll be able to explain it to a 5 yr old, or someone, say a lib, with a 5 yr old mentality.”

I totally agree. I have a BS in Business Finance and I recently read Basic Economics, 4th edition, and I really enjoyed his writing. Another articulate economist is Milton Friedman.


26 posted on 07/11/2011 6:15:00 PM PDT by Psycho_Runner (I never voted for change, I prefer folding money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“Read Sowell’s econ books, then you’ll be able to explain it to a 5 yr old, or someone, say a lib, with a 5 yr old mentality.”

I totally agree. I have a BS in Business Finance and I recently read Basic Economics, 4th edition, and I really enjoyed his writing. Another articulate economist is Milton Friedman.


27 posted on 07/11/2011 6:15:09 PM PDT by Psycho_Runner (I never voted for change, I prefer folding money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Really nice piece. Liberals affect utter incomprehension of the idea of “unknown unknowns.”


28 posted on 07/11/2011 6:32:05 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Thanks for the ping jaz.


29 posted on 07/11/2011 6:43:35 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I met Sec Rumsfeld a few months ago.


30 posted on 07/11/2011 8:23:15 PM PDT by cyclotic (Boy Scouts-Developing Leaders in a World of Followers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Politicians may only look as far ahead as the next election, but investors have to look ahead for as many years as it will take for their investments to start bringing in some money.

thanks jaz...so simple a kenyan could do it...

31 posted on 07/11/2011 9:49:00 PM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
If the Clinton admin hadn’t built a wall to prevent the FBI and CIA from sharing information they may well have been able to add 2+2 and get a 4.


Actually it was Jamie Gorelick who was the builder of that wall... and then we reward her with a seat on the 911 Commission and then put her on the boards of Freddie and Fannie...


the whole lot of them need to be put on trial then EXECUTED (if found guilty of treason)!!

32 posted on 07/12/2011 6:01:28 AM PDT by Nat Turner (I can see NOVEMBER 2012 from my house....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

a) it was widely reported that many Muslim groups knew that something was going to happen on 9/11
b) it was widely known that the towers had been attacked before and remained a target. Hush money was paid to 911 victims so that they would not claim negligence against the federal, state and local governments.
c) Walls were specifically placed between government agencies that blocked sharing of information.


33 posted on 07/12/2011 1:05:15 PM PDT by updatedscreenname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson