According to Jury No#2 , who opined over the fact Casey got off. The jury was evenly divided up until about noon Tuesday when the stronghold of six began to weaken.....they brought the verdict in less hten three hours later....so in those three hours alone evidence should have been requested....but not even a photo or anything was. Which again this would indicate to me in those three or so hours the pressure was on to get the six to fold...and they did.
Juror No. 2 was the last to fold....and I doubt very much he even knew he could have hung that Jury.,,and Casey would have to be re-tried. He simply didn’t understand the power he had nor the responsibility to do this right....nor the capability.
I haven’t followed the after trial hoopla. That information was new to me, and it is astounding.
How are the folks who continue to state there wasn’t enough evidence going to rectify this with their belief system?
That’s interesting because I had heard the initial vote was 2 to convict (clearly I heard wrong). That is actually pretty powerful half, and then they all just changed their minds without even seeing any more evidence. That seems so odd. I wonder what the argument was. Well, someone will write a book.